Twitter is an interesting place to interact with so many fellow
fans of your favourite sports teams, and at times fans of rival sports teams. We have all seen the conflicts that can
result from this. Some of it is mature
and friendly, while most of it can get fairly vicious.
What I’ve noticed is that there are so many different types
of fans. And even within each type of
fan, there are various levels of sports knowledge that can in itself create conflict.
My focus as I write this will be on baseball and more
specifically the Blue Jays, cause frankly that’s mostly what I care about. Although much of this I'm sure can apply to other sports and teams. I am going to attempt to categorise and
describe the different types of fans.
The die-hard fan
These fans will root for their team no matter what. They will watch every game or most games (as
their schedule dictates), even if the team ends up in last place. They always see winning on the horizon, even
if that is 5 years down the road. They
believe it can happen. These fans
typically can name every guy on the 25 man roster, and often know many
of the prospects coming up.
This is a team’s core fan base that will stick with them
through thick and thin. They will take the
emotional journey of winning and losing.
Their team becomes part of their identity.
The bandwagon fan
I’ve seen this description used very loosely in different ways. The way I see it, the
bandwagon fan only shows interest when their team is winning and is
successful. This is the fan that watches
playoff games but not regular season. Or
maybe will watch the end of a regular season when it is crunch time and much is
at stake. But it can also be applied to fans who jump on
board and follow the team all season when things are going well but will abandon
the team in losing years. These fans
will stop following their team if they see no chance of postseason success.
Often on twitter you see this term used as an insult. The reality is that there is nothing wrong
with the bandwagon fan. Although in most
cases, when someone is being called that on twitter it is not true. However, it is natural for people to want to be
part of the success of their local sports team.
These can be exciting times when a city or country can share in
something special. Bandwagon fans buy
tickets and watch games. They also disappear
fast. A franchise that goes years
without winning needs a core fan base of die-hard fans to be able to stay in
existence.
I’ve met many people in Toronto that would be able to name a
dozen players from the 1992 / 1993 teams, but couldn’t name more than 3 players
since. Some of them hopped back on in 2015
and know about Josh Donaldson and Jose Bautista now. They are not baseball fans really. But when the Blue Jays have success and they
hear the buzz, they will gladly hop aboard, buy a ticket or go watch the game
with you at a local sports bar, and ask the person next to them how many outs
there are in an inning.
The fickle fan
These fans are often mistaken as bandwagon fans, but I’m
going to put them in their own category.
They are not bandwagon fans because they follow the team and watch most
of the games regardless of the team’s success.
They don’t hop off the bandwagon in a physical way, but they do in an
emotional way. When the team starts to
lose they quickly disassociate themselves from the team. They become overly critical in an exaggerated way
and position themselves as the one who always knew the team would never
win. They are quick to assign
blame. The GM and/or manager and/or
struggling player become their enemy.
The GM/manager/player has taken away their joy of winning and they may
see it as deliberate, or the result of incompetence. Yes, these are the #fireGibby fans. Any time a bullpen pitcher blows the game, it
is the manager’s fault for putting him in the game. They refuse to be sad at their team losing
and instead position themselves in opposition to the team so that they are always
on the right side of what is happening.
They vent their anger and frustration with what is going on in a very
irrational way. In a sense, they always
have one foot out the door of their fandom but will never leave.
These fans are constantly positioning themselves for an “I
told you so”. They were against Shapiro
before he even took a step into his new office at Rogers Centre. They are against everything Gibby ever does. They are against every move until they see
that the move is working. That way, if the
move doesn’t work, they can say “I told you so”. They make absolute statements like “playoff
teams never lose games like this” or “they always don’t get a hit in these
situations”. They have a catastrophic style
of thinking that magnifies a small thing into something much larger. One bad game can set them off into a tailspin
where they sound like they are no longer a fan of the team. This creates conflicts with other fans, who
find themselves having to be defensive and adding reason and rationality to the
conversation. It becomes as if the fickle
fan no longer likes their team.
In some cases, these are hockey fans who apply their hockey
knowledge to baseball. If the best
hockey team in the league lost a game 8-0 to the worst hockey team in the league,
then there is an issue. That probably
should not happen. Similarly in football,
where glorious upsets are fairly rare.
But in baseball, a great pitcher can have a terrible day. Or a terrible pitcher can have a great
day. It happens. The best teams lose to the worst teams an
awful lot in baseball. Over 162 games, you
get a lot of micro kinds of things happen that don’t make sense at the macro
level.
If their team wins the World Series, these fans will tell
you that they believed in them all along.
Hopefully they delete a thousand tweets that prove otherwise.
The championship fan
Ever meet someone who lives out west but is a Yankees
fan? They have zero ties to New York
but they have chosen the team to be their favourite. These fans would never choose the San Diego
Padres, or Tampa Bay Rays. They chose a
winner. Likely they made this choice in
a year where the Yankees were dominating.
They buy the winning brand and associate themselves with it. There is no geographic attachment whatsoever. They root for the team that they believe will
win the most and have the most success. I’m
not talking about New York folks who root for their Yankees. Or even people who grew up before the Blue
Jays existed and became Yankees fans because of the geographic proximity (and
that Buffalo stations would play the Yankee games).
When the Red Sox built good teams over the last years, we
saw “Red Sox Nation” grow. These are “championship
fans”. They want the glory of their team
winning, but the choice of who their team is, was based on probability of
success.
If their team ultimately loses, the first thing they will do
is count World Series rings for their team vs. yours.
The anti-fan
These are the fans who don’t have a specific team to root
for. Instead, they have a team they root
against. Think Marty York. We have all seen these types. They will crap all over their targeted team
and glorify the rivals of that team. And
guess what….. on average there is a 29 out of 30 chance that they will be
winners at the end of the season.
Chances are that their targeted team will not win the World Series. And assuming that is the case, they will claim
victory for the season. Their joy is for
the fans of that team to feel the pain of loss.
Ask yourself which category you are in
Within each category there are variations to be sure. I also think it is possible that some fans can
change over time. For example, a busy
schedule in your work and personal life can leave little time to watch sports
and maybe you find yourself a little bit in the bandwagon category because of
time constraints. In some cases a fan
can hop aboard a bandwagon and never get off…thereby becoming a die-hard fan. Also, a baseball season is very long, but in
a given moment we forget how long it is and many people can find themselves frustrated
and act a little fickle. The purpose of
this is to categorise the primary tendencies. So which one are you?